the morning of august 25th, intellectual property press i think-tank and chongqing yongchuan phoenix lake intelligent equipment collaborative innovation research institute has successfully held the "robot of intellectual property (patent blue book papers)" (hereinafter referred to as the "blue book" robot world premiere). "blue book" disclosed that the number of robot patent applications in the world's top 10 applicants, all foreign enterprises, chinese companies do not list. among them, only japan has hitachi, mitsubishi and fanuc, yaskawa and other 7 companies shortlisted, and hitachi ranked first. in addition, there are 2 companies listed in the united states, 1 companies in south korea list.
in this regard, wang jun said that although it is difficult to fully surpass the foreign robot technology patents, but in some technical points, domestic can still achieve beyond. the controller as an example, both solid high or other domestic enterprises in the control system controller, and have some or all of the intellectual property rights, in some key technology patents can even go beyond the foreign brands.
production, research and research in china has been carried out for a long time, and it is important to ignore that china's robotics industry is not optimistic about the transformation of technological achievements. this is indeed the reality in china, most of the knowledge of patent in university, but the knowledge from the patent into application in fact there is a long distance, only through the "production", the intellectual property rights into productive forces, can really show their value.
based on the theory of "industry, university, research and production", this paper puts forward the concept of "government, industry, learning, production and utilization". in wang jun's view, the robot industry is a capital intensive industry, needs the support of capital; in addition, the government also needs to lead the robot industry is a new industry, without the guidance of the government, the road ahead will be difficult.
(source: intellectual property press)